Posted September 28, 2010 at 12:09 pm
by Wade Slome CFA CFP:
In the midst of the so-called “Lost Decade,” pundits continue to talk about the death of “buy and hold” (B&H) investing. I guess it probably makes sense to define B&H first before discussing it, but like most amorphous financial concepts, there is no clear cut definition.
According to some strict B&H interpreters, B&H means buy and hold forever (i.e., buy today and carry to your grave). For other more forgiving Wall Street lexicon analysts, B&H could mean a multi-year timeframe. However, with the advent of high frequency trading (HFT) and supercomputers, the speed of trading has only accelerated further to milliseconds, microseconds, and even nanoseconds.
Pretty soon B&H will be considered buying a stock and holding it for a day! Average mutual fund turnover (holding periods) has already declined from about 6 years in the 1950s to about 11 months in the 2000s according to John Bogle.
Technology and the lower costs associated with trading advancements is obviously a key driver to shortened investment horizons, but even after these developments, professionals success in beating the market is less clear.
Passive gurus Burton Malkiel and John Bogle have consistently asserted that 75% or more of professional money managers underperform benchmarks and passive investment vehicles (e.g., index funds and exchange traded funds).
This is not the first time that B&H has been…
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted August 25, 2010 at 7:50 pm
by Margaret Collins:
Peter Kuhn, an investor from San Jose, California, who owns more than $1 million in municipal bonds, scours pricing websites and uses Zions Bancorporation’s online brokerage to avoid getting overcharged when he buys tax- exempt debt.
Consumers who aren’t as savvy may be paying more than they have to for state and local obligations in the $2.8 trillion U.S. municipal market, where individuals and mutual funds hold about two-thirds of outstanding securities. Firms selling to customers mark up the price an average $5 to $10 per $1,000 bond, or 0.50 percent to 1 percent, said Thomas Doe, chief executive officer of Municipal Market Advisors, a Concord, Massachusetts-based research firm.
Because tax-free yields are at their lowest levels in four decades and dealers have flexibility on pricing, investors have to be more careful to make sure the markup they’re being charged isn’t excessive, said Mitchel Schlesinger, chief investment officer at FBB Capital Partners.
“Do more homework to make sure you’re not getting ripped off,” said Schlesinger, who oversees $80 million in munis for the Bethesda, Maryland-based advisory firm. “You could easily give up a year of coupon income because yields are so low.”
Shrinking Supplies
Shrinking supplies of tax-free municipal debt and the lowest rates on U.S. Treasury 10-year notes in more than a year have driven down yields on 10-year and 30-year AAA general obligation bonds to the lowest levels since the 1960s, according to MMA’s Doe. The 10-year tax-exempt rate was 2.60 percent as of Aug. 24 and the 30-year rate was 4.16 percent, according to MMA’s indexes.
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted August 18, 2010 at 2:21 pm
by Dyan Machan and Reshma Kapadia:
If the stock markets were a public beach, the red “high hazard” flags might still be flying over the lifeguard’s chair. Or at the very least, a strong yellow.
The summer has been calmer than the spring, but not by much, not with the foundering euro and stubborn unemployment at home offering daily reminders that global economic waters are still choppy. And the stock market remains as riptide-prone as ever.
According to Schaeffer’s Investment Research, the Dow is on pace to register 90 days this year with swings of 100 points or more—more than twice as many as in any of the three years before the crash.
As fund managers keep warning, many of last year’s top-performing stocks were risky or near-death companies that now are struggling once again. Small wonder that many mainstream investors remain anxiously on shore—collectively, Americans hold $9.4 trillion in cash, 27 percent more than in 2007.
Of course, where fearful investors see threatening surf, the most successful pros see big-kahuna waves that they can ride to profits.
We focused this year’s installment of “The World’s Greatest Investors” on four people who’ve proved they can make good money in stocks even in difficult times. And indeed, some were more upbeat after the market’s ugly summer tumbles than they were before it—after all, their favorite stocks were cheaper.
That said, these managers are anything but blasé about the rough market—and, for what it’s worth, none of them believes that new financial regulations will affect their portfolios much—yet.
With a combined 100 years’ investment experience among them, they’re being selective and disciplined as they decide which stocks are safe to own. Susan Byrne, a veteran of many decades in the mutual fund world, is moving into big conglomerates that pay fat dividends; Thyra Zerhusen likes smaller firms that dominate niche markets, especially in tech or industrials. International-investing specialist David Herro thinks the best way to ride out the market’s turmoil is to buy stocks in Europe—even though Europe instigated much of that turmoil.
And even the venerable Warren Buffett has been reshaping the sprawling Berkshire Hathaway empire to make it less vulnerable to the market’s unpredictable tides.
For more about how these proven veterans are balancing caution and opportunism, read on…
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted July 14, 2010 at 11:29 pm
Via CNN Money:
At 82, T. Boone Pickens has worn multiple (10-gallon) hats: billionaire investor, corporate raider, hedge fund manager, and proselytizer for natural gas and wind — not to mention fervent Oklahoma State football fan. Through it all, though, he’s been an oil and gas man. He spoke with Fortune’s Katie Benner about the perils and possibilities of investing in energy during a time of tumult for the industry. Edited excerpts:
Why hasn’t the BP spill pushed oil prices higher?
Alot of oil is gushing from the blowout, but it wasn’t in the system to begin with, so it’s not like we’re losing supply. But prices could go higher. Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) and Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500) are both predicting that oil [about $77 a barrel as of late June] will hit $100 next year, and you know that will force equities to move higher too. I think that’s a realistic projection because supply is capped at about 85 million barrels a day, and if we have any sort of global recovery, the only way to control the demand will be through price.
I would also mention the moratorium on drilling — whether or not it holds. Gulf of Mexico production isn’t that significant in the overall picture, but it matters at the margins, and every 100,000 barrels of oil or so affects the market. We had 34 rigs operating in the deep water, producing about 1.4 million out of the Gulf of Mexico’s daily 1.7 million barrels of oil.
Because it’s so complicated to stop and start production, a six-month ban will probably be more like 12 to 18 months. Even after we restart the wells, their capacity to produce will have declined by 25% to 35% over that time. This will also eventually move prices.
Are you worried about the political uncertainty that the Deepwater Horizon disaster has generated?
As far as stocks are concerned, this could mean a buying opportunity. As long as there’s political uncertainty around the energy space, stock prices will come down. But keep in mind that the midterm elections in November could erase that discount over time as political uncertainty resolves.
Would you buy BP stock, given that the price has fallen over 50% since the accident?
We don’t own the stock now, and I’m not sure if I’d be a buyer or a seller. There’s too much uncertainty about what will happen to the company. But it wouldn’t bother me to own the bonds. There’s a lot of value in the debt structure, and it would take a very large loss for bondholders to see their value eroded.
What about other energy stocks?
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted June 11, 2010 at 12:38 am
by Andrew Hallam:
If you watch the stock market, the economy, and you think bad news is bad, you’re probably a lousy investor
I’m not going to make myself popular when I say this, but investing in the stock market is pretty easy. Long term, there’s an upward trend, so it’s a lot like gambling with the odds stacked very heavily in your favour.
The stock market has always been an easy place for me to make money— because I’m not very smart.
Most smart people make terrible investors. Here are four reasons why:
1. They watch market news, talk about the economy and try to figure out where things are going next.
This is foolish move number one, but really smart people have a tough time ignoring the media and the economy. Smart people can’t help it. They want to use their brainpower, and in the process, they lose, disastrously long term to the dumb money—the stock market indexes. Buying diversified indexes on the cheap is when, to steal Buffett’s phrase, “Dumb money ceases to be dumb”
If the stock market is trading at a reasonable multiple (today it trades at roughly 14X earnings, which puts it at roughly the 100 year average) then you’ll make long term money by buying at these levels.
Valueline has a great, long term DOW Jones Industrials price chart dating back to 1920. History spells out one consistent reality. Buy when PE ratios are at or below 14X earnings, and you’ll make long term money. Buy when PE ratios are silly (like 22 or above) and the decade that follows will give you investment misery. Where’s the PE today? Roughly 14X earnings.
It doesn’t matter how you slice the pie; that’s the historical reality.
But if you were a smart person living during times when the PE ratios were below 14X earnings, and if you watched, digested and analyzed economic news, you probably wouldn’t have bought anything. You would have sat waiting for better opportunities, for the economy to turn around, for unemployment declines to abate, for prices to get cheaper. Too bad. You wouldn’t have made as much money as you could have. Your brain power would have handicapped you.
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted May 22, 2010 at 12:00 am
I recently had the pleasure of having dinner with an OEX trader, Floyd, from OEXOPTIONS. com, whose on-line advisory service has been rated in the top five by Stocks and Commodities Magazine for two years running. Floyd flew in from Florida to have dinner with my friend Johnny and his wife.
A trading friend and I were happy to tag along.
During our conversation Floyd mentioned to me that his most popular article is about his losing $250,000 in the stock market over a 6 month period. He certainly got my attention.
I suggest you read the article in its entirety for it may just offer some important clues about how to make $250,000 in the stock market.
What follows is an amended version.
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted May 11, 2010 at 6:35 am
by Joshua M Brown:
I’m only 3/4′s of the way serious with that headline, but I’m about to make a pretty profound point so hold your comments until I get there…
Flip through this weekend’s issue of Barron’s and you’ll see headlines like these: Stocks At A 19 Month High and Investors Are Getting Giddy Again and The Old Normal and We’ve Filled The Lehman Gap, etc. All great reads, by the way, and all appropriately cautious and accurate.
But they miss the point.
The thing about selling stocks right now is, it forces you to do something else with your money. And that’s not necessarily a good thing these days.
Your options are as follows…
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted April 23, 2010 at 10:30 pm
from Billy at:
GlobalStockInvestingToday.com
Here’s a Must-watch video interview with investing genius, Mohnish Prabai
All the greats say the same thing – it is not about how active you are in the market,it is about how right you are.
Investing is not about the volume of activity,it is about sustainable compounded returns at low risk – volatility is only a risk if you use short term capital.
Interesting comments about technology companies – the biggest losses in my portfolio have come from the technology sector (America Movil, Nokia, Garmin) though I have now broken even on technology companies with the revaluation of Intel, Microsoft, Dolby and Infosys.
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted April 10, 2010 at 10:33 pm
from Investopedia:
Great money managers are like the rock stars of the financial world. The greatest investors have all made a fortune off their success and in many cases, they’ve helped millions of others achieve similar returns.
These investors differ widely in the strategies and philosophies they applied to their trading; some came up with new and innovative ways to analyze their investments, while others picked securites almost entirely by instinct.
Where these investors don’t differ is in their ability to consistently beat the market.
See the investors via this slideshow…
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Posted March 29, 2010 at 7:27 pm
From Yahoo.com:
They were hard to miss during the tech-stock mania a decade ago, when the Nasdaq seemed like a casino built by morons and a chimp with darts could pick winners. You would hear about these guys — nearly all of them were guys — and wonder: Could anyone make a living this way? And if the answer was yes, why were the rest of us suckers still holding down regular jobs?
No doubt, it’s been a long time since a question like that troubled your imagination. And perhaps you assumed that the twin calamities of the Internet crash and the Great Recession had doomed the day-trader species in the unruly jungle of American capitalism. But some dreams refuse to die, and few, it seems, are more resilient than the dream of beating the market while wearing nothing but tighty-whities.
Or, if you are Andy Lindloff, a pair of jeans and a black waffle-pattern shirt.
“Banks are seeing a nice little lift,” he says, staring at computer screens one recent Wednesday morning, sipping coffee from a Denver Broncos mug. “The European banks are up, so that may bleed over to ours. Bank of America (BAC) might be one to watch.”
Mr. Lindloff, 49, is sitting in his living room here in a city known as “surfer’s paradise,” about 25 miles north of San Diego. Surrounded by the playthings of his daughter — a toy oven, a doll house — he appears to be alone. In fact, he has plenty of company. With a hands-free headset, he is speaking to Steve Gomez, his partner in Today Trader, a two-year-old Internet venture that is “about helping traders find success through virtual technology,” as it says on the company’s Web site.
Filed Under: Investing
Category Feed:
To get an emailed digest of all posts, join our free Wealth Wire News Feed
Stay connected to the pulse of Renegade Investing & Wealth Generation
Subscribe to our email wire and receive hand- picked DAILY-updated financial, investing, and economic news that is usable, unique, and timely.
Find Out More
or sign up below
Loading ...
Add Your Comment | 0 Comments